top of page
Search
  • Writer's picturetalktosaimkhan

Overview


HOLDINGS: [1]-An employee's unfair competition law claim under Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200, against his employer did not fall within the purview of Broughton-Cruz's restriction on the arbitrability of unfair competition law claims for public injunctive relief, and was thus subject to arbitration, because it sought only private injunctive relief and restitution, given that, in describing the employer's alleged acts of unfair competition, the employee's complaint repeatedly referred to wage and hour violations directed at the employee only, and given that the only express beneficiary of the employee's requested injunctive relief was the employee, and the only potential beneficiaries were the employer's current employees, not the public at large.


Outcome


Order affirmed in part and reversed in part.

3 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Online Slot Game of Fun88 Is Very Popular Casino Game

Online slot game is a very popular game on the planet. In 1895 Charles Fey imagined the principal Slot machine. Slot game is very easy to play in light of the fact that there are no troublesome guidel

Overview

Overview: feha law HOLDINGS: [1]-Although an employee claiming wrongful termination in violation of public policy based on age discrimination did not also assert a claim under the Fair Employment and

Procedural Posture

Plaintiff, a former employee of defendant employer, sought review of a judgment from the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Two (California), which affirmed the trial court's orders

Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page